The Relationship Between Non-Cash Assets and Charitable Giving

The Relationship Between Non-Cash Assets and Charitable Giving

When a donor wants to make a significant gift to an institution or to an organization, the default thinking is to use available cash or other relatively liquid investments such as listed equities whether from a private foundation, a Donor Advised Fund or a checkbook.  In some cases, however, when there is not enough cash available, but the donor still wants to make one or more significant gifts   it may be time to look at alternative options such as using non-cash assets to fund the gift and achieve the kind of impact around the issue or issues he or she cares most deeply about.

Using assets such as art, securities, land or intellectual property as an alternative to, or in addition to, traditional financial support is becoming increasingly popular, particularly for individuals who would prefer to preserve their capital. There are tax benefits as well. A donor can potentially avoid capital gains taxes that may arise if the asset is sold, while simultaneously getting a charitable deduction.

Along with the positives associated with contributing non-cash assets, there are also pitfalls and challenges to take into consideration.  There is the issue, for the recipient organization, of what to do with the gift. Securities are easy; they are liquid. Hold on to them and reap the reward when they increase in value or sell them for the current value. Interest or dividend bearing securities can provide much needed revenue or can be reinvested. Non-cash assets can be more of a burden to an organization than a benefit.

A gift of land carries with it ongoing costs for maintenance and taxes. Unless the land gift includes the financial resources to cover these costs, the recipient organization may have inherited an additional financial burden that it simply cannot absorb.

While every gift is appreciated, what does an organization do with a piece of art?  Clearly what they really need, and want, is the cash value.  While the gift may be well meaning, converting it to cash will cost an organization both time and money…not always readily available. There are costs associated with the valuation and sale of the art and what happens if there is not a ready market to sell it? For many organizations the greatest need is for general operating support. This helps the organization keep the lights on, fund initiatives, keep or hire staff and generally continue to do the work they are committed to doing. In making a gift, the donor should consider whether it is realistic for the organization to be the recipient.

Then there is the question of validating value and not just relative to a piece of art. With intellectual property, the holder of an asset may attach greater value to it then is realistic particularly if the holder created the property involved.  Their emotional connection can skew perspective.

Intellectual property (IP) is a complicated non-cash asset. Whether a trademark, patent, copyright or trade secret, even when properly valued, the IP can pose some unique challenges for both the holder and the recipient. There can be overlaps – a copyright or patent might also be a trade secret. Alternatively, an individual could own the rights in the underlying work, but the application of the work may be covered by a separate intellectual property right. In these instances, ownership of both interests needs to be addressed to ensure that the appropriate actions have been taken to value, protect, and transfer the rights and interests.

So What Should a Donor Know About Using Non-cash Assets to Fund Charitable Gifts?

  • Is the ownership of the asset clear and unencumbered or are there specific restrictions or expectations connected to the use or transfer of ownership? For example, if the gift is land and the donor wants the land to be used in a certain way, this may cause problems for the recipient organization;
  • Does the donor have full ownership? A partial interest in any intellectual property is non-deductible. In order for a donor to receive credit for the gift, they must donate their entire interest in the intellectual property;
  • If the asset is a piece of art, documentation of provenance must accompany the art piece along with valuation;
  • If the gift is licensing rights, the recipients must adhere to the licensing terms. This can place a burden on an organization not equipped to enforce the rights;
  • If the gift is a copyright of a book, the charity may get the royalties associated with the copyright. However, if the copyright is shared between the author and the publisher or other parties, there has to be documentation regarding the relinquishing of all rights. If the creator of the asset donates it directly, and has not sold the asset previously, then he or she can only get a deduction on the cost basis, not the market value of the asset unless the market value has been determined. Valuation is based on market value of the same or similar item or replacement value or present value of revenue generated (royalties x length of patent or trademark rights).

Even with the best intentions as motivation it is a good idea to discuss the viability and applicability of a non-cash gift with the intended organization. The relationship between donors and the organizations they support is a partnership. In any good partnership there has to be good communication, with both parties understanding and agreeing to the terms and conditions, and expectations, connected to any gift.

A final consideration: In many instances, gifting non-cash assets should be one of the discussion points in the estate planning process particularly if there is a desire to reduce potential tax to the corpus or if heirs are not interested in having the assets in question.

Susan Winer, Co-Founder of Strategic Philanthropy, Ltd., a global philanthropic advisory firm headquartered in Chicago and working solely with high net worth and ultra-high net worth donors. Since 2000 the firm has been at the forefront of helping individuals, families, closely held and family owned businesses plan, assess, and manage their charitable giving to ensure that they achieve measurable impact with their philanthropic investments. Strategic Philanthropy, Ltd. works in partnership with the clients’ legal and financial advisors, providing customized support to donors whether just starting out, revisiting or revising their charitable activities.

DISCLAIMER

All right, title and interest in and to this article is the sole and exclusive property of Succession Advisors, LLC and/or its independent 3rd party guest writers (collectively, “Succession Advisors”). The information contained in this article is not intended to provide professional, investment, legal, financial or tax advice and should not be relied upon in that regard. The contents of this article are for general information only and are not provided with regard to your specific investment objectives, financial situation, tax exposure or particular needs. Nothing contained herein should be used as the basis for making any specific investment, business or commercial decision. In particular, Succession Advisors does not guarantee the success of any net worth or liquidity management strategy, estate or wealth transfer analysis or strategy, or similar strategy, analysis, tactic or related report. You understand and acknowledge that all such strategies, analyses and tactics are subject to various risks, are based on projections and estimates, which have no guarantee of successful implementation. The contents hereof are not a recommendation of, or solicitation for, the subscription, purchase or sale of any security, including any fund(s) and/or investment products mentioned herein.

Investments, including interests in real estate and private equity funds, are subject to investment, tax, regulatory, market, macro-economic and other risks, including loss of the principal amount invested. Investment denominated in a foreign currency are subject to factors including but not limited to changes in exchange rates that may have an adverse effect on the value of the investment. Past performance as well as any projection or forecast used or discussed in this article are not indicative of future or likely performance of any investment product. Statements may be forward looking and are not intended as specific investment advice or guarantees of future performance. Such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or result expressed or implied by such statements. You should read the final prospectus, offering memorandum, partnership agreement and/or other supplemental and controlling documents before making an investment decision regarding any particular security carefully before investing in any security.

The contents of this article are subject to change and may be modified, deleted or replaced at any time in Succession Advisors’ sole discretion. IN PARTICULAR, SUCCESSION ADVISORS ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR, NOR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS, ENDORSEMENTS, OR WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER IN RELATION TO THE TIMELINESS, ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ANY CONTENT CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE. WHILE CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN IN PREPARING THE CONTENTS OF THIS ARTICLE, SUCH CONTENTS ARE PROVIDED TO YOU “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. IN PARTICULAR, NO WARRANTY REGARDING SUITABILITY, ACCURACY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE IS GIVEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH SUCH CONTENTS. SUCCESSION ADVISORS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS, DAMAGE, COSTS, CHARGES AND/OR EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ARTICLE OR ANY RELIANCE ON THE CONTENTS OF THIS ARTICLE. You agree it shall be your sole responsibility to verify and/or confirm any information contained in this article prior to relying on it, in connection with which you assume all risk.

To the extent this article is of an independent 3rd party guest writer, all statements and/or opinions expressed in this article are solely the opinions and the responsibility of such independent 3rd party guest writer and Succession Advisors is not responsible, or liable to you or any third party, for the content or accuracy of this article.

The provision of any services or products provided by Succession Advisors and/or its affiliates shall be expressly subject to the particular terms and conditions as contained in a separate written agreement with Succession Advisors and/or its affiliate as applicable. Succession Advisors will not provide any individualized advice or consulting unless agreed to by a separate written agreement. Succession Advisors does not provide investment, legal, financial or tax advice.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0